PROPOSIA

Rejected? Here's your next move.

Upload the rejected proposal and the reviews. An agent works out whether this was bad fit, bad proposal, or bad luck — then tells you, point by point, where the reviewer is right, where they misread you, and exactly what to change before you resubmit.

Your uploaded files are not stored. The report is saved to your account until you delete it.

Uses 1 credit per run.

Method

How it works

  1. 01

    Upload the rejection

    Your proposal as submitted, plus the reviews, summary statement, or evaluation report. PDF, DOCX, ODT, TXT, or Markdown.

  2. 02

    Honest diagnosis

    Bad fit, bad proposal, or bad luck — and a straight recommendation, including 'don't resubmit this' when that's the truth.

  3. 03

    A plan and the words

    Every criticism assessed, a prioritized revision checklist, and drafted point-by-point replies you can adapt.

Rubric

What the agent does

Six stages, each assessed against its own rubric. It will not flatter you, and it will not argue on your behalf against a point the reviewers got right.

Table 1. Resubmission stages
§1Comment triage
Reviews split into individually answerable points, quoted verbatim — including the coded language and faint praise that hide real objections.
§2Rejection diagnosis
Bad Fit, Bad Proposal, or Bad Luck, using score spread and reviewer disagreement rather than guesswork.
§3Is the reviewer right?
Each criticism checked against what your proposal actually says — agree, partly agree, or disagree with evidence.
§4Fatal flaw detection
Criticisms no revision can fix — eligibility, remit, or a design the panel considers unsound — flagged before you spend months.
§5Revision planning
Deduplicated edits ordered by effort and impact, because one good change often answers three reviewers.
§6Response drafting
Replies that concede, clarify, or rebut — respectful, specific, and pointing to where each change now lives.

Other agent tools