Rejected? Here's your next move.
Upload the rejected proposal and the reviews. An agent works out whether this was bad fit, bad proposal, or bad luck — then tells you, point by point, where the reviewer is right, where they misread you, and exactly what to change before you resubmit.
The rejected proposal
The proposal as you submitted it
Drag & drop or tap to browse
Supported: .pdf, .md, .txt... | Max: 15MB/file | Up to 1 files
Reviewer comments
The reviews, summary statement, or evaluation report
Drag & drop or tap to browse
Supported: .pdf, .md, .txt... | Max: 15MB/file | Up to 1 files
The call (optional)
The call you applied to, or the one you're now targeting
Drag & drop or tap to browse
Supported: .pdf, .md, .txt... | Max: 15MB/file | Up to 1 files
Your documents are used only for this run and are not stored.
Uses 1 credit per run.
How it works
Upload the rejection
Your proposal as submitted, plus the reviews, summary statement, or evaluation report. PDF, DOCX, ODT, TXT, or Markdown.
Honest diagnosis
Bad fit, bad proposal, or bad luck — and a straight recommendation, including 'don't resubmit this' when that's the truth.
A plan and the words
Every criticism assessed, a prioritized revision checklist, and drafted point-by-point replies you can adapt.
What the agent does
Six stages, each handled by a focused sub-agent with its own rubric. It will not flatter you, and it will not argue on your behalf against a point the reviewers got right.
Comment triage
Reviews split into individually answerable points, quoted verbatim — including the coded language and faint praise that hide real objections.
Rejection diagnosis
Bad Fit, Bad Proposal, or Bad Luck, using score spread and reviewer disagreement rather than guesswork.
Is the reviewer right?
Each criticism checked against what your proposal actually says — agree, partly agree, or disagree with evidence.
Fatal flaw detection
Criticisms no revision can fix — eligibility, remit, or a design the panel considers unsound — flagged before you spend months.
Revision planning
Deduplicated edits ordered by effort and impact, because one good change often answers three reviewers.
Response drafting
Replies that concede, clarify, or rebut — respectful, specific, and pointing to where each change now lives.